Question a Day Campaign on Twitter
Q1. How many criminals you know who on finding the alleged murder weapon, personally hand it to CBI? #JusticeforTalwars
Q2. During narco how did all 3 servants narrate same sequence of events placing them at the crime scene? #JusticeforTalwars
Q3. An explosive evidence (Hemraj’s blood on Krishna’s pillow cover) ignored for years suddenly became a typo? #JusticeforTalwars
Q4. Is CBI afraid to put the “complete” narco & other scientific tests of all 3 servants on the record? #JusticeforTalwars
Q5. If Krishna was “not truthful” & “misleading”, why did CBI target Talwars without evidence? #JusticeforTalwars
Q6. President watches Talvar,only 3rd film of his tenure:jst gd film or burning ques of injustice? #JusticeforTalwars
Q7a. “Why crucial parts of the narco video like these are being ignored?” @38:45 Part 1/3
Q7b. “Why crucial parts of the narco video like these are being ignored?” @41:15 Part 2/3
Q7c. “Why crucial parts of the narco video like these are being ignored?” @29:50 Part 3/3
Q8. Can CBI b trusted with a fair investigation if they can’t even keep their own records safe? #Aarushi
Q9. If Talwars were guilty why would they contest CBI’s closure report and demand a reinvestigation?
Q10. #Aarushi murder an honour-killing when there is no proof Hemraj was even in her room?
Q11. What new evidence did CBI unearth to prove Talwars guilty after trying to close the case for the lack of it? #Aarushi
Q12. How was hemraj found with slippers on his feet if his body was dragged to terrace?
Q13. If Talwars ‘dressed up’ the scene why did they leave bloodied whisky bottle, palm and shoe prints around? #Aarushi
Q14. Why did CBI ignore an Expert Committee opinion that Hemraj was killed on the terrace? #Aarushi
Q15. Why has CBI ignored its own sound test which confirmed that nothing was heard in the parents’ room? #Aarushi
Q16. Did CBI tutor Bharti becoz she said in court ‘jo samjhaya gaya hai vahi bol rahi hoon’? http://jjcmusingzz.blogspot.ca/2015/11/aarushi-murder-verdict-fact-or-faux.html?m=1
Q17. No evidence of forcible entry in #aarushi home. How does that rule out friendly entry by outsiders?
Q18. Why does CBI say no outsider involved in #Aarushi when Hemraj’s room had wine, beer bottles and 3 used glasses?
Q19. Why was Nalini Singh not allowed to testify with evidence that corroborated the presence of outsiders in #Aarushi home?
Q20. How does Internet going ‘on & off’ imply Talwar’s guilt when it did that again in police presence on the next day? #Aarushi
Q21 Did CBI check if Talwars were drugged on the night of the murders per scientists suggestion? #Aarushi
Q22. How did bloody hand and shoe prints on terrace which were larger than Rajesh Talwar’s size, prove him guilty? #Aarushi
Q23. Nobody stopped police from breaking the lock, why put their incompetence onto Rajesh? #Aarushi
Q24. Why was the crime scene not sealed and entry of visitors restricted? #Aarushi
Q25. How did a brick wall with wooden laminate change to a wooden partition in the verdict!? #Aarushi https://t.co/lKBQFwTnmT
Q26. Who says Nupur didn’t break down? Bharti, the maid said she saw her weeping! #Aarushi
Q27. Why can’t an outsider who commits 2 murders, have the courage to drink whiskey before leaving? #Aarushi
Q28. Why did CBI oppose plea to let their own investigator @arunkumar783 testify in #Aarushi case? Truth too inconvenient?
Q29. Why was the expert committee opinion that injuries could be caused by khukri ignored in the judgment? #Aarushi
Q30. Did CbI influence Dr.Dohare to change murder weapon from khukri to scalpel after 2 yrs?
Q31. Did CBI IO AGL Kaul go out of his way to frame the Talwars? #Aarushi http://bit.ly/218ur6J
Q32. Why did CBI hide from court own scientific tests that show Talwars are innocent? #Aarushi
Q33. How could an IG Police tear reputation of a little girl to shreds on national TV without any evidence? #Aarushi
Q34. Why is CBI obsessed with tears? Open-and-shut case should rely on hard evidence not pop psychology. #Aarushi
Q35. Two years later, two innocents remain trapped in prison. How long will justice stay asleep? #Aarushi
Q36. Would a person who is guilty beg for a Touch DNA test that can confirm killer’s identity? #Aarushi
Q37. How did Section 106 of the IPC – shifting burden of proof to accused – apply to people who are asleep #Aarushi
Q38. How did section 201 of IPC apply when investigations and scientific tests showed no deception? #Aarushi
Q39. Why did CBI not send the blood-stained khukri from Krishna’s room to CDFD for analysis? #Aarushi
Q40. How credible is “expert” report based entirely on false premise that Hemraj’s blood found in #Aarushi’s room?
Q41. How did “experts” take 2 years to say evidence that nails a (inconvenient) murderer is just a “typo”? #Aarushi
Q42. Why did doctor find abnormalities in #Aarushi’s private parts 1 yr after he said Nothing Abnormal Detected?
Q43. Can #Aarushi judgement be fair when judge and son started writing it even before defence arguments began?
Q44. How can no one loitering near flat prove Talwars’ guilt when CBI’s own report says it’s not foolproof?
Q45. Why was illegal id “email@example.com” used to communicate in #Aarushi case?http://bit.ly/1TuKgyZ
Q46. Did police incompetence at crime scenes lead to Talwars’ wrongful conviction? #Aarushi http://bit.ly/1IzREZc
Q47. How could golf stick be murder weapon when it had no blood or DNA on it? #Aarushi
Q48. Could a 7 mm dental scalpel have made “a single clean cut 14 cm long wound in #Aarushi’ neck” as per autopsy?
Q49. If loose ends in case get acquittal in #SalmanVerdict,how did lack of evidence lead to conviction in #Aarushi?
Q50. How were drastic changes in witness testimonies acceptable in #Aarushi case? http://goo.gl/cCLDml
Q51. Why proof of hemraj’s mobile being found active in Punjab was not submitted in court? #Aarushi
Q52. How did AGL Kaul conclude that #Aarushi ‘s cellphone was thrown in park by Talwars?
Q53. How did AGL Kaul conclude no outsider involved when DNA on Sprite bottle didn’t match with any suspect? #Aarushi
Q54. Where are the gloves Rajesh Talwar supposedly wore while drinking whisky?What proof he drank at all? #Aarushi
Q55. Why did AGL Kaul get Bharti to change her statement that she unlatched the door and came in? #Aarushi
Q56. How could Nupur go out of Hemraj’s room when the door from his room to the passage was blocked? #Aarushi
Q57. Which case represents everything that is wrong with our system? #Aarushi http://goo.gl/AwNCMX
Q58. Why did police photographer say”dhyan nahin hai”to each uncomfortable question in cross examination? #Aarushi
Q59. Should the judge be worried about facts of Dr Urmil’s testimony or whether Talwar’s knew her before? #Aarushi
Q60. Why did the court believe the tutored Bharti but not staff testimonies favourable to Talwars? #Aarushi
Q61. Why would an accused hide one alleged murder weapon, but clean other golf clubs unrelated to the crime?#Aarushi
Q62. How does “witness” Sanjay Chauhan travel 28 km for morning walk, enter #Aarushi home and not be seen by anyone?
Q63. Will the voice of common people be heard, will justice be served? #Aarushi https://goo.gl/7mBWJ2
Q64. How was disposal of bloody clothes concluded when photos show same clothes in morning as night before? #Aarushi
Q65. If CBI had a strong case why did they submit forged documents to the court? #Aarushi http://goo.gl/O17U9n
Q66. How did CBI know 6 days before forensic lab about lab’s crucial “typo error”? #Aarushi
Q67. Does the #Aarushi case need a fresh look as crucial facts have been deliberately hidden?
Q68. Will the new year bring fresh hope for 2 innocents languishing in jail? #Aarushi
Q69. Does the #Aarushi judgment focus more on prose than facts and evidence?
Q70. Will the #Aarushi case ever reopen and the truth be revealed? http://goo.gl/Jy1A7d
Q71. Why did CBI withhold data that could prove Talwars’ innocence despite HC order? #Aarushi
Q72. Why was it unreasonable to assume that the missing Hemraj had killed #Aarushi?
Q73. What is the credibility of Dahiya’s “crime-scene analysis” based not on actual visit, but on photos? #Aarushi
Q74. How credible is Dr Naresh Raj’s “expert report” based on his own MARITAL experience? #Aarushi
Q75. If CBI itself said no evidence, no motive, no weapon, why were Talwars convicted? #Aarushi
Q76. Will #Aarushi ‘s teary eye, painted on Dasna jail wall bring fresh hope for the Talwars? https://youtu.be/jlitT82gmqQ
Q77. When judgement itself rules out sexual activity what motive does it leave for Rajesh’s “rage”? #Aarushi
Q78. How did CBI’s Kaul conclude Rajesh drank liquor when DNA,finger prints on bottle were not his? #Aarushi
Q79. Has CBI put our society to danger by letting the real killers of #Aarushi, Hemraj go scot-free?
Q80. If Guilty can only be established by facts, why were Talwars convicted based on flimsy circumstances?
Q81. Why were journalism basics broken in #Aarushi case with “leaks” carried without verification? http://goo.gl/lHUald
Q82. Will discussions on the #Aarushi case help us achieve our goal to Free The Talwars? #RTI
Q83. Why is #Aarushi ‘s grieving father blamed for being unable to identify Hemraj’s putrefying body?
Q84. How do loop of phone calls establish Dinesh Talwar asked rape not be mentioned in #Aarushi’s autopsy?
Q85. Why were Dohare’s reports made by “deliberately suppressing facts” in Aarushi’s Post Mortem, acceptable in court?
Q86. Is the explanation by @arunkumar783 of what happened to #Aarushi on 16.5.08 the most plausible one?
Q87. What Irony! World inside sees them as innocent & one outside believes they are guilty? #Aarushi http://goo.gl/5nRQLv
Q88. Was judiciary immune to Talwars’ trial by media that had created such a negative image? #Aarushi http://goo.gl/31UmyR
Q89. Can we hope for higher courts to overrule the flimsy grounds on which Talwars were convicted? http://goo.gl/frjTto
Q90. Will the court look at fresh evidence in #Aarushi case with fresh eyes & give justice to Talwars? https://youtu.be/xXpjGDLYwzU
Q91. Did inventive narratives in the garb of journalism define #Aarushi case? https://youtu.be/pt_1qKCHLH0
Q92. Where is discrepancy in bedsheets? One – a cover taken off before #Aarushi went to bed. Other – sheet underneath
Q93. Why has Cbi not produced even one witness to corroborate the affair between fatherly Hemraj & #Aarushi
Q94. Is judgment suggesting Talwars changed “night clothes” in anticipation of a crime of rage? #Aarushi
Q95. Why is it unbelievable Nupur accidentally left the key in #Aarushi ‘s door on that fatal night?
Q96. Why has the role of the 3 servants not been investigated despite their admission of presence in #Aarushi home?
Q97. How did CBI’s Kaul decide a 7mm scalpel inflicted the gash on #Aarushi’s neck when expert says it’s impossible?
Q98. Why was CBI’s @arunkumar783 ,who probed #Aarushi case not allowed to file charges? https://youtu.be/EHGzMoyQ08E
Q99. How difficult would it be for Hemraj’s friends to take terrace keys after killing him? #Aarushi
Q100. If the CBI couldn’t prove Hemraj’s body was dragged to the terrace why blame #Aarushi ‘s parents?
Some more Unanswered Qustions
The investigating agencies, media and the courts have held the parents guilty practically from the begining, even though there is no basis. It is unfortunate that the parents are undergoing the trial within the glare of such a negative public perception. If the case had been handled differently, it might well may have been solved by now, without creating so much grief and anguish for Aarushi’s family members. There remain many unanswered questions which need to be pondered over:
THE LOCAL POLICE
1) Why didn`t the police seeal the crime scene immedeately?
The police did a shoddy job of the investigation as they did not bother to either seal the scene of the crime or restrict entry of visitors including the media. 24 sets of fingerprints were taken from the scene of crime including the whiskey bottle found in the Talwar residence, but 22 of them were not found to be fit for comparison. After destroying vital evidence the UP police left little hope for nailing the accused.
2) Why didn’t the police call for a dog squad?
Clues regarding the identity of the killers may have been revealed if the police had called in the dog squad on the first day. However this golden opportunity was missed by the UP police.
3) Why didn’t the police check the food samples?
The police could have taken the food samples lying in the kitchen of the Talwars’ residence to check if Rajesh and Nupur had been drugged since Hemraj’s post mortem report showed that he did not consume any food that night.
4) Why were the police so lax and not check for blood stains?
A member of the family showed the police some suspected blood stains on the landing adjacent to the terrace and on the terrace door; when the police were shown this, all they said was ‘It seems no one has been here for months together.’ Whose directions were they awaiting by ignoring this evidence on day one? Did they really need to be told by the family members how to investigate?
5) Why did the police speak to the media when an investigation was on?
The UP police had asked Aarushi’s family not to interact with the media, giving them a veiled warning to the effect that it could derail the entire investigation and allow the culprits to escape. So gullible were the Talwars that they believed the Police completely and allowed them to spin a web of lies around them. Even today, these lies continue to vitiate the minds of people and the CBI has continued where the UP police left off. If the Talwars had countered these lies in the initial days itself, maybe Rajesh and now Nupur would not have been arrested for killing their own daughter! But how was a simple family to gauge the vicious minds of the investigating agencies in the middle of the huge tragedy which had struck?
1) Why was the CBI’s first investigation team on this case replaced by a second one, especially since the first team had announced it was about to chargesheet the culprits?
Why does the second CBI team not mention the first team’s investigations:
a. Multilpe scientific tests done on the Talwars including the lie detector, brain mapping and narco are clear whereas the same tests done on the three servants show their involvement in the crime. Why does the CBI not want to believe their own test results? Why did they subject both Rajesh and Nupur to a total of approx 9 tests each, if they were not going to take the leads from any of them?
b. Sound reconstruction test at the Talwars’ house in June 2008 had concluded that sound from Aarushi’s room couldn’t be heard in her parents’ room with the AC on in both the rooms at night. This of course is conveniently missing from the closure report filed by the 2nd team.
c. UV Light Testing on 1 June 2008 apparently didn’t pick up any bloodstains to indicate that Hemraj was killed anywhere except the terrace.
2) Why is the CBI ignoring vital evidence from its own investigation?
The forensic report confirms that Hemraj’s blood was on a pillow cover seized from Krishna’s room. The pillow cover was seized from Krishna’s house after a lead from his narco. When the pillow cover was sent to CFSL for analysis, human blood was recovered. On further analysis in CDFD, Hyderabad, it was found that the pillow cover had Hemraj’s blood on it. What more does the CBI want? Isn’t this incriminating evidence? Krishna’s narco shows his involvement, his pillow cover has one of the victim’s blood on it and the CBI wants to frame the Talwars?
3) IF, AS the CBI says, Rajesh committed the murders under sudden provocation, why didn’t his clothes from that evening have Hemraj’s blood on them?
Rajesh’s driver has very clearly stated that he saw Rajesh in the same set of clothes on the night before (when he came to return the car keys) and on the morning of the murders. It is obvious why Rajesh had Aarushi’s blood on his clothes, but it is more important to note that Hemraj’s blood was not found on his clothes. The description of Rajesh’s clothes on 15th night also matches that of the maid’s description of clothes given on 16th morning. And if as the CBI claims it was sudden provocation on the part of Rajesh, why then has Nupur after all this time been incriminated?
4) WHY DO experts at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi completely contradict the CBI’s latest theories about the murder weapon?
The experts’ opinion presented in a report in The Indian Express on 7th June 2008, concluded that Aarushi was murdered with a sharp-edged knife, given the deep cut on her throat (with probably a wooden handle to administer the blunt injuries) — rather than a surgical instrument like a scalpel, which “is so small it can only cut the skin layer by layer”. The murder weapon has been changing from the 1st team (khukri – a curved Nepali knife), to the 2nd team (scalpel, golf club or perhaps a combination of golf club and scalpel). And what evidence does the CBI have for making the golf club the murder weapon? No blood has been found on the golf stick and the scalpel is nowhere to be found. Incidentally, Rajesh had a set of golf clubs at home and the CBI claims that 2 of the golf clubs were cleaner than the others. However the CBI’s own reports show that the golf club allegedly used in the crime had not been cleaned.
5) IF AARUSHI’S parents had tampered with the crime scene, why would they have left the biggest clue?
The Ballantine’s whisky bottle with many fingerprints and both victims’ bloodstains on their dining table for the police to find the next morning? Was this not the first thing they would have hidden?
6) WHY DO Raj Kumar’s former employers Dr Praful and Dr Anita Durrani claim that the CBI is misrepresenting their testimony?
The CBI has been claiming that Raj Kumar had an alibi for the night of the murders. But they have deliberately omitted what the Durranis have been saying all through out. Raj Kumar finished his work before midnight and since his bathroom was outside the house’s main back door, he could come and go whenever he wanted.
7) If Aarushis parents were guilty, why did they protest the CBI’s move to close the case last year and insist that investigations continue?
Would they not have been happy that the CBI had decided to close the case? Why were they so vehement that the CBI should not close the case and the culprits should be caught. If they have something to hide, why are they agitating for advanced forensics to be applied such as touch DNA?
THE TECHNOLOGY to solve this murder mystery exists!
Touch DNA is a technique that’s been used in criminal cases worldwide since it can analyse evidence even after years of contamination. In India recently permission was given in the Bhanwari case to get touch DNA done from abroad. (http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-02-15/jaipur/31062967_1_jaloda-bones-fbi-report) Why is the CBI refusing to put all speculation to rest and get touch DNA testing on the evidence it has gathered, such as the whiskey bottle with still-unidentified fingerprints?
8) WHY DOES the post mortem report not corroborate with subsequent statements made by the doctor who conducted the PM?
The PM report shows that vagina was NAD (normal) and there was a whitish discharge. However almost 1.5 yrs later, in the statement to the 2nd CBI team the doctor suddenly remembers radical new facts that are not present in the original postmortem report — such as the hymen was “ruptured”, had “an old tear”, “the vaginal orifice… was unduly large”, “mouth of cervix was visible”, the private parts were extraordinarily dilated and cleaned after the murder. These new facts are not only radical but extremely strange. What is the credibility of these findings? Why are they not mentioned in the PM report? In addition, cleaning is inconsistent with the post-mortem report’s claim about presence of whitish discharge.
9) HOW ARE we being ‘sensitive’ to the underclass by unquestioningly believing the police and CBI’s insinuations that Hemraj-the-grandfather was in a sexual relationship with a child?
Is it necessary that the servants are innocent and the Talwars are guilty just because the underprivilged have to be protected? Is there any basis for the innuendoes which have been made first by the Noida police and now by the 2nd CBI team? We seem to be deliberately shredding apart the reputation of both Hemraj and Aarushi after they are dead just because they can’t protect their honor! As a society, we seem to have degraded ourselves to the lowest level possible.